Episode 054: Breast Cancer Series, Pt. 3-Breast Cancer Vocabulary

The language of breast cancer can be confusing and very technical. In this episode, we help you learn and understand so many important words and phrases that have important implications on diagnosis and management. Understanding these will not only help you learn more about breast cancer, but it will also ensure you are better able to communicate the lingo to your patients!


First we start out with a breakdown of the important terms you may see on a pathology report about a patient’s diagnosis.  

How do we classify breast cancer:

  • Hormone receptor status by immunohistochemistry (IHC): As discussed in episode 003, IHC helps detects the phenotype of the cell 

    • Estrogen receptor (ER+) 

      • Presence predicts response to estrogen blocking agents

      • Cut off is >= 1% of the cells are positive 

    • Progesterone receptor (PR+)

      • Often ER/PR+ can be called “Hormone receptor positive”

      • You CAN have ER+ without PR+

  • HER2 status by IHC and/or Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH):

    • IHC:

(Infographic by Ronak Mistry)

  • FISH: using colored probes (also covered in Episode 003)

    • HER2 locus is on chromosome 17

    • Green probe = control = CEP17 which is centromere 17

    • Red probe = HER2 gene

    • Lots of red and little green = HER2 amplified

    • Remember 2, 4, 6

      • HER2 signal >6 = positive

      • Ratio of HER2/CEP17 >2 and HER2 >4= positive

      • HER2 >/= 4 but <6 and/or HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0 → equivocal

        • They re-assess/ask another pathologist to look at the slides 

        • If still equivocal, then considered HER2 negative with a comment 

      • HER2 <4 signals/cell and/or HER2/CEP17 ratio <2.0 → negative

  • Morphologically:

    • Based on anatomy of the breast

  • Invasive vs. in situ:

    • Did tumor break through the duct and into the adjacent issue? 

  • Lobular carcinoma in situ: 

    • Lobules are milk-producing glands 

    • LOCALIZED cancer in the lobule

    • Not considered to be a precursor to cancer, but does suggest patient is high risk 

  • Ductal carcinoma in situ: 

    • Ducts carry milk from the lobules 

    • LOCALIZED cancer in the ducts

    • Considered to be precancerous to invasive cancer

  • If not in situ then we typically see invasive ductal but could see alternative histologies 

  • May see terms like invasive mammary carcinoma or invasive breast cancer “no special type” - which is synonymous with invasive ductal carcinoma which is going to be the most common type of breast cancer

    • This is in contrast to the other histologic subtypes called “special types”

    • These can portend a better prognosis if they are a pure special type histology with a few exceptions (note can have mixed picture with some special type histologic features)

    • Data is very limited so hard to draw significant conclusions

    • Largest study comes from Korean Breast Cancer Registry:

  • Special type of tumor = malignant phyllodes tumor

    • Think of this like a soft tissue sarcoma

    • Need good surgical excision 

  • Grade: 

    • Grade 1, 2, and 3

    • Just remember 3 is worst prognosis (high grade) and 1 and 2 are often lumped together (low to intermediate grade)

    • Three components of a score to determine grade:

      • Tubule formation (more tubules = normal growth = lower grade)

      • Nuclear pleomorphism → large and weird nuclei = higher grade

      • Mitotic count

  • Ki67: 

    • Can be thought of as a measure of how fast cells are growing 

    • Has clinical utility only for prognosis in patients with ER+/HER2- patients who don’t need chemotherapy

    • Important to note given its implications on the use of targeted agent known as abemaciclib 

  • Lymphovascular invasion

    • The presence of tumor invading lymph nodes and blood vessels, which in general suggests higher risk features and can affect radiation planning

  • Molecular Classification of Breast Cancer

    • Historical Context

      • Several individual studies showed that women with ER positive tumors had a lower response to chemotherapy than ER negative tumors

      • Thought was that we might be overtreating women with chemotherapy so we needed more than just IHC and FISH 

    • Original publication by Perou and colleagues in 2000 showed six different molecular subtypes could be predictive of response to chemotherapy and prognostic for recurrence

    • Subtypes defined based on multi-gene assays often look at those associated with ER signaling → note this is not done routinely as we still use IHC and FISH to guide treatment

    • Three common molecular subtypes to be aware of:

(Infographic by Ronak Mistry)

  • Also had HER2-enriched, claudin-low, and normal breast-like

  • Molecular understanding of cancers lead to development of assays used to determine if patients with ER+ breast cancer need chemotherapy:

    • Most common that we have are “Oncotype Dx” (21 gene assay) and “Mammaprint” (70 gene assay)

      • These provide a score that lets us understand both the prognostic recurrence risk and now have been validated as predictive tools to guide chemotherapy decisions 

  • Specific Molecular testing (often done via NGS): 

    • Looking for mutations that provide targets 

    • ESR1 mutation is important → dictates switch of endocrine therapy from AI to a SERD

    • PIK3A mutation is important → targeted pill therapy


Important surgical terminology: 

  • Lumpectomy aka breast conservation surgery aka partial mastectomy: Only the mass and some surrounding tissue is removed

  • Mastectomy: Whole breast is removed

  • Margins:

    • When performing lumpectomy, the surgeon will use ink to draw a circle around the tumor + some adjacent healthy tissue. When the pathologist looks at the tissue under microscope, we are hoping to see “no ink on tumor” meaning that there is healthy issue surrounding the tumor that has been removed. 

      • If there is tumor at the ink line, double risk of recurrence

      • Clear margins has the lowest chance of recurrence 

    • For invasive cancer: Society of Surgical Oncology and American Society for Radiation Oncology recommend “no ink on tumor” based on results of a large met-analysis. Essentially, they are saying that wider margins (for instance >2mm) is no different in terms of outcomes than narrower margins

    • For DCIS: SSO and ASTRO recommend 2mm margins also based on meta-analyss 


General approach to TNM staging 

  • Think about it as dollar bill amounts → similar to the mnemonic for the common pathway of the coagulation cascade

  • Think 1 dollar, 2 dollar (don’t forget we used to have the 2 dollar bill), and 5 dollar bill

  • T1C = > 1 cm

  • T2 = > 2 cm

  • T3 = > 5 cm

  • Nodal disease → the axilla is key

    • Mobile axillary nodes palpable = N1

    • Fixed or matted axillary nodes palpable = N2

    • Internal mammary nodes (IMN) without axillary nodes = N2 → think inner quadrant of breast → N2 because these are central nodes

    • Everything else = N3


Endpoint descriptions for non metastatic trials:

  • Often use surrogates for OS which have not been definitely validated

  • DFS = Disease free survival

    • Got definitive treatment surgery +/- radiation +/- systemic therapy

    • Time until recurrence of cancer in either breast, distant disease, second cancer, or death

    • Second cancer is important as we are giving chemo that could cause MDS and leukemia which should be considered when giving to a large population

  • iDFS = Invasive Disease Free Survival

    • Same except DCIS does not count

  • RFS = Recurrence free survival

    • Same as disease free survival without second cancer counting

  • EFS = time to progression of disease

    • This is used commonly in neoadjuvant trials

  • Pathologic CR

    • This is also commonly used in neoadjuvant trials 


References:

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10549-020-05861-6: Korean Breast Cancer Registry about different tumor subtypes

BreastCancerNow.org: Great resource for general information for patients about breast cancer

https://www.nature.com/articles/35021093: Molecular subtypes of breast cancer

https://www.breastcancer.org/research-news/20140402: Article about tumor margins

https://www.uptodate.com/contents/breast-conserving-therapy?search=breast%20cancer%20margins&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1#H15 : Article about tumor margins


The crew behind the magic:

  • Show outline: Ronak Mistry, Vivek Patel

  • Production and hosts: Ronak Mistry, Vivek Patel, Dan Hausrath

  • Editing: Resonate Recordings

  • Shownotes: Ronak Mistry

  • Graphics, social media management: Ronak Mistry

Previous
Previous

Episode 055: Breast Cancer Series, Pt. 4-Surgical management for breast cancer

Next
Next

Episode 053: Breast Cancer Series, Pt. 2-Fundamentals of Radiation Oncology in Breast Cancer