Episode 042: Myeloma Series, Pt.3 - Intro to Multiple Myeloma

In this continuation of our myeloma series, we discuss the progression of MGUS & smoldering myeloma to multiple myeloma. We also outline how to risk stratify a patient with multiple myeloma and gauge their response to treatment. 


This episode has been sponsored by Primum. To sign up for a free account, check out: tfoc.primum.co.

  • We highly recommend you check out our hemepath series to better understand some of this discussion!

    What is the natural history of progression from MGUS to smoldering myeloma to multiple myeloma? 

    • MGUS 

      • Common! Occurs in ~5% of the adult population

      • Risk of progression of ~1% per year

      • Higher chance of progression if:

        • Non-IgG 

        • M-spike > 1.5 g/dL

        • Abnormal FLC ratio  

    • Smoldering Myeloma

      • Less common. Estimated to occur in 0.5% of adults over 40yo (Thorsteinsdottir et al., Blood 2021) 

      • Risk of progression to multiple myeloma is highest in the first 5 years and decreases significantly after 10 years 

Visual representation of the probability of MGUS and smoldering myeloma progression to multiple myeloma (Image from Figure 3 from Kyle et. al, NEJM, 2007; no copyright infringement intended)

How do we determine the number of plasma cells in a bone marrow biopsy? 

  • Aspirate smears and flow cytometry will often underestimate the plasma cell percentage as plasma cells die during the aspiration process. However, flow cytometry is still useful for identification of abnormal plasma cell populations. 

  • For the percentage of plasma cells, we rely on IHC and use a CD138 stain on the core biopsy 

How do we risk stratify patients with multiple myeloma? 

  • We check (in serum): 

    • LDH

    • Albumin

    • Beta 2 microglobulin

  • Arguably more important, however, is FISH testing. The important chromosomal changes that portend a worse prognosis are:

  • t(14;16) and t(4;14) 

  • Deletion 17p → remember that del 17p is associated with tp53 mutation

  • Amplification 1q (> 3 copies)

  • This data is then incorporated into the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS; ):

Revised International Staging System ([R-ISS]; Image from ASH Clinical News; no copyright infringement intended)

When risk stratifying a patient with MM, why do we need both FISH and karyotype testing? 

  • The FISH testing gives us information about high-risk chromosomal changes important for prognosis and treatment. 

  • Even though we don’t currently use the karyotype in our stratification systems, a complex karyotype may signify higher risk disease. 

What are the levels of response to MM treatment? 

Response criteria in multiple myeloma, as defined by the International Myeloma Working Group (adapted from Kyle and Rajkumar, Leukemia, 2009; no copyright infringement intended)

How do we define disease progression?

  • A >25% increase in:

    • Serum M spike

    • FLC ratio

    • 24-hour UPEP

    • Bone marrow plasma cell percentage.

  • New plasmacytoma or bone lesions 

  • Note that asymptomatic lab value elevations are defined as a progression event

How do we define the different responses to MM treatment?

  • PR: 50% reduction in the M spike 

  • VGPR: you can detect an M spike but cannot quantify it or 90% reduction in the M spike, important goal for stem cell transplant

  • CR: requires a bone marrow biopsy, <5% clonal plasma cells

  • sCR: no clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow and no serum laboratory abnormalities 

General approach to treatment (more to come in future episodes!): 

  • Treat patients with “induction” regimen for 4-6 cycles 

  • Goal is to achieve a VGPR before autologous transplant

  • Perform a bone marrow biopsy to determine if we have achieved CR

    • Goal: BM Plasma cells <10% before transplant

Why is testing for minimal residual disease important?

  • There is some thought that MRD negative patients may be able to back off on maintenance treatment. Whether MRD negativity is a surrogate for improved overall survival, however, remains a very open question. 

How do we detect minimal residual disease?

  • The MRD testing techniques are NGF (Next Generation Flow) and NGS (Next Generation Sequencing). 

  • NGF utilizes baseline immunophenotype information to get a sensitivity of ~1 in a million cells.

  • NGS can identify 1 in a million cells, and emerging data suggests that it may be able to get a sensitivity of 1 in 10 million cells. Unfortunately, at this time, it is very expensive and not widely available. 

Note that multiple myeloma is not curable. But we hope to use risk stratification and MRD testing to keep patients from receiving unnecessary treatment. 


References: 


The crew behind the magic:

  • Show outline: Vivek Patel

  • Production and hosts: Ronak Mistry, Vivek Patel, Dan Hausrath

  • Editing: Vivek Patel

  • Shownotes: Madeline Fitzpatrick, Ronak Mistry

  • Graphics, social media management: Ronak Mistry

This episode has been sponsored by Primum. To sign up for a free account, check out: tfoc.primum.co.

Previous
Previous

Episode 043: Myeloma Series, Pt.4 - Myeloma Pharmacology

Next
Next

Episode 041: Myeloma Series, Pt.2 - Intro to MGUS and Smoldering Myeloma